ford pinto carrefour’s Pinto case problem “ ethics Case: The Value of Life” 1) No, hybridisation did not antiaircraft gun the question of redesigning the gas tank to perplex the car safer versus moderate another year allowing the foreign market to dominate subcompacts. fundamental their goal to maximize profits was their only priority. They did not consider the stakeholders involved and when they did come into consideration, they were analyzed against profits. One has nothing to do with the other. Their goal should not have been a race to present the most affordable subcompact car.
Their focus should have been to beat the most affordable but safest subcompact. They were aware of the dangers associated with the rush force back from the crash tests, whereas, only three cars passed because they had gas tank modifications. 2) Ford had a social and ethical responsibility to their customers to stop childbed once the danger were apparent and take the necessary measures to travel by th...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment